FUJIFILM 16-55/2.8 LM WR:┕ Amazon (*) AFFILIATE LINKS TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:Fujinon 16-55mm f2.8: Good By Jim Fisher Updated September 26, 2022 (Credit: Jim Fisher) The Bottom Line The Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R WR delivers strong optical performance and an all-weather build, but it I have both the EOS R + RF 24-105 and the X-H1 + 16-55 mm f2.8. Overall the R with RF 24-105 is sharper from edge to edge throughout the zoom range and has more micro contrast then XF 16-55 red badge. p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Canon EOS R + RF 24-105 vs Fujifilm X-T2 + 16-55mm. Do you feel like the Canon EOS R kit is a significant upgrade to the Fuji The AF+MF function further elevates this, allowing autofocus with subsequent manual fine-tuning. Armed with these extraordinary features, the FUJINON XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR is poised to elevate your photographic pursuits. Dive into a world of precision, clarity, and brilliance with every shot. Experience the difference. Size Matters. The first thing I noticed about the XF16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR was the size. It is quite a bit larger than its predecessor, the Fuji 18-55mm “kit” lens. I had just photographed my first wedding with my new Fuji gear and borrowed the 18-55mm because the 16-55 hadn’t shipped yet. The results from the 18-55 were underwhelming. Looking at the used market I can get the 16-55 for 700$, almost all the primes I want cost almost the same as just this one lens 16mm 1.4 600$, 23mm 1.4 750$, 10-24 900$. Thinking of just buying the 16-55 and trying it out I guess, and then just buy back prime later if its not for me. mpj9 • 3 yr. ago. A full review of the two Fujifilm Best Midrange Lens from the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 compared to the XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 kit lens. Today we'll review the sharpness, rendition, contrast and overall usability of these two lenses. Therefore, we'll determine what suits your photography requirements from a price vs image quality perspective. 4qugZEi.